From: Yash (yashk2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 04:08:27 MST
Have you tried it?
Did you see anything having to do with converting numbers into BASE 50 and
calculating with that BASE?
Are you aware that many computer-based calculations and descriptions are
done in Base 2 and in Hexadecimal (Base 16)?
Where does your fear of a BASE different than 10 stem from? Isn't that a bit
irrational?
So what if that guy really had written something about BASE 50? What would
have been the point?
After you try the calculations on that page please let us all know if there
was anything, the slightest thing at all in that text which had to do with
calculation about BASE 50 as YOU ASSERTED IT DID.
But do try it, otherwise as I said, you're just showing you've been over the
text rapidly and are biased an prejudiced.
You haven't read the text properly, you haven't tried the exercise, and you
wrongly assumed it was some bullshit about BASE 50 to support your own
prejudiced views about such things.
Please do so and write back.
You probably owe that guy an apology or two as well.
Yash.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of Steele, Kirk A
Yash, misspleling in a fit of stupified astonishment is one thing. Clear
lack of comprehension of a holon within a formal system is what this is
evidence of. He is attmepting to create a situation to fit a definition.
Look at "BASE 50" TOTAL BULLSHIT!
http://www.gosai.com/chaitanya/saranagati/html/vishnu_mjs/math/math_7.html
This guy doen't know shiite from shinola
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:38 MDT