From: Yash (yashk2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 01:42:28 MST
I think you're right.
Except for the Vedic 'BS' part.
Mnemonics do exist and there's nothing particularly 'BS' about that one.
Well not if you subscribe to the 'Dates' and 'origin' which Hermit has
mentioned himself on his own and got himself all excited about.
Yash.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of Kalkor
The impression I got was that Yash was proposing the construction of a
language wherein everything has multiple meanings, and great depth of
information can be stored. He used the vedic PI BS as an example.
Yash, you might have better luck using analogy next time, as certain people
in here seem to have latched onto the validity of your example (or lack
thereof) and missed the concept for which the example was given in the first
place...
Maybe parable?
I maintain that any language we were to create that fit these criteria would
just confuse the hell out of me, and I want no part of it, I tell you!!!!
;-}
Kalkor
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:38 MDT