From: Yash (yashk2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 19:12:35 MST
I respectfully disagree about the part saying "the recent discussions
certainly fall into that category".
Consider this:
Imagine the following case: COV has memespace A (or belief-space or belief
system), some view another body B with memespace B to be completely
antithetic to memespace A.
However, proper research show that there is a function, F, which is
analogous to a decryption process which makes some parts of memespace B not
only intelligible to memespace A adherents but also interesting and relevant
(e.g. the mathematical/scientific data).
In other words:
b = F(memespace B)
y C b is true.
y C (memespace A) is found to be also true.
I also refer you to the extract of John L. Casti's book concerning norms,
whereby for proper scientific advancement there should be no privileged
source of scientific information.
In any case, I do not feel I have been doing the abuse, I have rather been
the target of much abuse in forms of repeated insults.
Well, unless this is really the kind of communication (insult-laden) and
learning process (shoddy and biased) you want to pursue. In which case, I'll
gladly remove myself from the list.
Yash.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of BodieI think we should
only kick people from the mailing list when it is the last possibly resort
and that person has been constantly abusive and destructive to the
memespace we have created. The recent discussions certainly fall in to
that catagory, and I would support kicking yash if that was what was
finally agreed. Also I would support some kind of voting system and we
would only kick a person if we had something like 90% agreement. I don't
really think a general majority would be a good idea.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:40 MDT