From: Rafael Anschau (anschau.ez@terra.com.br)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 02:27:52 MST
I do not understand your reasoning.
At 13:08 11/02/02 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>--- Rafael Anschau <anschau.ez@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>This is one interpretation. However, when I set the context properly, I see
>>the
>>meaning of the overman not as man's genetic superiority over others(racial,
>>or whatever)
>>but a vision of man which is the oposite of religion's. (men as sheeps)
>>Nietzche broke away from this vision by introducing his own view. Call it
>>existentialist.
>>He was similar to Darwin in that regard.
>>
>>
>>
>[athenonrex]
>so you want "men as sheeps" then, you would have all of human
>kind following? and none leading themselves, instead of being lead
>by others? odd.
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>--->Get your free email @godisdead.com
>Made possible by Fade to Black Comedy Magazine
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:43 MDT