From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat Jul 27 2002 - 15:51:40 MDT
On 27 Jul 2002 at 15:25, Hermit wrote:
>
> Have you heard of "framing"? It is easy.
>
> Cop decides suspect probably is the perp, and even if not, deserves
what is coming... Cop plants evidence.
>
> Bang.
>
> Naturally, the same goes for a premeditated criminal act. To confuse the
trail, the perp simply spreads around a little "incontestable" DNA
evidence
from multiple sources.
>
> Bang again.
>
> Naturally, Joe, scientifically literate (but criminal enforcement neophyte),
foreman of the jury, finds the first perp "guilty" - and the second "not
guilty"
- or indeed, finds somebody, not the perp, guilty.
>
> First and third are executed, second walks..
>
> Joe sleeps well at nights, and continues to argue for the infallibility of
DNA testing. So simple, so scientific, so accurate, so objective.
>
> Yet is still takes subjective analysis to determine whether the objective
evidence is really applicable.
>
> Regards
>
> Straw Murdering Hermit
>
And this would be happening in what miniscule percentage of
circumstances?
>
> ----
> This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2002 board on Church of Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;threadid=25812>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:49 MDT