From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon Aug 19 2002 - 20:26:19 MDT
On 20 Aug 2002 at 3:08, Mark Collins wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 August 2002 2:22 am, you wrote:
> > On 19 Aug 2002 at 19:08, rhinoceros wrote:
> > > It seems everyone prefers to use Palestinian citizens rather than
> > > Israeli citizens as human shields. They just find it more natural.
> >
> > That's because Israeli civilians (including children), being
> > targets, are useless as shields.
>
> Oh cut the holier than thou bullshit.
>
The truth stings, doesn't it, Jew-hater?
>
> Every nation on this planet targets civilians, whether they admit it
> to the press or not. It demoralizes the population, and takes their
> will to fight. Of course, killing 2 or 3 civilians doesn't work, but
> killing hundreds, or thousand does.
>
> Israel is doing this by arresting "suspected" terrorists and
> destroying their homes imediately after. The criteria for these
> "terrorists"? People who speak out against an aggressive state. There
> are no trials.
>
The homes being bulldozed these days belong to relatives of suicide
bombers, so they will have to pay an economic price to counterbalance
the 25k bounty paid to them by Saddam Hussein and the assistance
they receive from Hamas and Saudi "charities"; this is the same reason
the Israelis are trying to relocate such people to other Palestinian areas
(to make them pay a social price). Both measures are designed to
deter individuals and families from supporting the suicide bomber
option. I guess this is, in your eyes, more brutal than blasting peoples'
kids to smithereens at discos.
>
> Sharon is wanted in Europe for war crimes. You want to know why? A
> couple of decades ago he orders a couple of thousand of these
> "terrorists" rounded up. They were never heard from again. There have
> been reports that they were shot in a stadium.
>
I thought he was wanted in connection with the Sabra and Chatilla
camp massacres in Lebanon, for letting the Christian Phalangists in for
some overnight bloodletting. Syria surrounded a Palestinian town and
shelled the occupants, killing 30,000; this is more than have died in the
past 20 years in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but since the murderer
was a Muslim and not a Jew, this act received a free pass from Nurglish
criticism.
>
> Palestine is doing a similar thing, but they DO have the moral high
> ground. Israel siezed territories, forces people out of their homes,
> and destroyed lives. Surely they have a right to return the favour?
>
Don't talk to me about Arafat; he once had a Palestinian father killed as
a collaborator, then handed the murdered man's ten year old son a
pistol, told him that the Israelis killed his father, and told him to use that
gun to take revenge when he grew up.
And the neighboring Arab states have killed more Palestinians than
Israel has, and evicted them from their homes, but that's okay for
Nurglists, because they're not the hated Jews.
And you misspell 'epitome".
> --
> ===
> Mark 'Nurgle' Collins
> http://www.thisisnurgle.org.uk
> Stupid IRC quote of the <variable time period>:
> <phoenix> insider, you'll have to excuse nurgle, he's the epitamy of
> evil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:54 MDT