From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:25:16 MDT
Brent Scowcroft is Wrong: We
Must Attack Saddam
by Daniel Pipes and Jonathan
Schanzer
FrontPage Magazine
August 20, 2002
"Don't Attack Saddam," Brent Scowcroft implored President
George W. Bush in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
But, for the sake of America's war on terror, the retired general
should review a primary lesson the United States was dealt by the
attacks on 9-11. America learned the hard way then that waiting to
use what Scowcroft calls the "best strategy and tactics" to remove
a global threat is ill advised.
Saddam Husayn poses no less of a threat to American and global
security than Osama bin Laden, yet for more than a decade,
Washington has jockeyed and yammered for the right moment,
the right place, the right opportunity to depose him. The time for
prevarication has passed. The time to attack is now. Saddam must
be overthrown, and soon.
Here are two main holes in Scowcroft's argument:
¢ Saddam only seeks weapons of mass destruction (WMD), he
says, to "deter [America] from intervening to block his aggressive
designs" and will not use them. Whence does he get such an idea?
Saddam assuredly will use them if circumstances make this useful
to him.
For a start, note that he is the only ruler in power today who
actually has deployed WMD, and he has done so often. During the
1980-1988 war with Iran, he showered chemical gases on Iranian
soldiers. He also turned chemicals on his own Kurdish population.
Further, Saddam is obsessed with building WMD. On losing the
Kuwait war in February 1991, he agreed to U.N. demands that his
WMD be "destroyed, removed or rendered harmless." He also
acquiesced to demands that inspectors be allowed into Iraq to
ensure that his WMD program did not start again. Over the next
seven years, however, he did everything in his power to build
chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, plus the missiles with
which to deliver them. In 1998, Saddam refused to allow U.N.
inspectors into Iraq any longer.
It would be, notes Richard Butler, former chief U.N. weapons
inspector, "foolish in the extreme" to believe that Saddam has not
been rebuilding his arsenal since then. Saddam's media confirms
this point. The Iraqi Ath-Thawra newspaper stated recently stated
that "possessing such weapons constitutes a right of self-defense
and a necessity of national security, whether anyone likes it or
not."
According to reports from Iraqi defectors in December 2001 and
March 2002, Saddam now has "mobile germ laboratories
disguised as milk delivery trucks, and a network of underground
bunkers for chemical and biological weapons production."
In a yet more worrisome development, Khidhir Hamza, former
head of Saddam's nuclear weapons development program and
another defector from Iraq, estimates Saddam will need two to
three years "to get the fissile material program going" for nuclear
weapons production. "The bomb design and hardening," he says,
"will probably take another year."
Thus, Saddam will likely have gone nuclear by 2006, and one
must count on his using them. This prospect makes a preemptive
attack soon not only advisable but urgent.
¢ Scowcroft holds "there is little evidence to indicate that the
United States itself is an object of [Saddam's] aggression," making
it highly unlikely that America would fall victim to Saddam.
Actually, Iraq's media regularly calls for military and economic
assaults on "the tyrannical U.S. enemy." Recently, Saddam
announced a one-month oil export suspension designed to
"directly deprive the U.S." A recent Iraqi government statement
even called for "striking at U.S. interests in the Arab homeland."
(Note that this rhetoric is strikingly similar to that of al-Qa'ida and
other international terrorists whom Mr. Scowcroft claims "have
little in common" with Saddam.)
Saddam and other international terrorists have something else in
common: links to a number of plots against America. In 1993,
Saddam's agents tried to assassinate former President George
H.W. Bush. According to a report in the Saudi daily Al-Watan,
Iraq also "planned to attack American ships in the Arabian Gulf
[Persian Gulf] at the beginning of 2001. The plan was to load half
a ton of explosives aboard a commercial ship operated by a crew
of suicide sailors."
Iraq has other links to terrorism against the United States. Czech
intelligence officials now say they have a photo of Mohammed
Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, meeting with an Iraqi intelligence
agent in Prague. Two of his co-conspirators were also said to have
met with Iraqi intelligence officers in the United Arab Emirates,
while Bin Laden aides reportedly met with officials in Baghdad.
Brent Scowcroft is on target when he states that "if we are truly
serious about the war on terrorism, it must remain our top
priority." Rightly understood, however, that means beginning with
the elimination of Saddam's regime, with its many ties to global
terrorism, war crimes, and the attacks of last fall.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:55 MDT