Re: virus: righteousness in nature

From: Walter Watts (wlwatts@cox.net)
Date: Sun Aug 25 2002 - 11:26:12 MDT


joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:

> On 25 Aug 2002 at 3:53, rhinoceros wrote:
>
> >
> > [Walter Watts]
> > To marginate at the right versus wrong oasis whilst the gonadal
> > products are slain on ANY account is to pay homage to the
> > "intentional" stance. A "god" of design. A "caring" deity that somehow
> > has a stake in the "biological phlegm" that cogitates and can discern
> > "right from wrong".
> >
> > I don't acknowledge their "rightness".
> >
> > Only their survival.
> >
> > And the "accidental" nature of our existence.
> >
> > To hope for righteousness in nature is to disavow its statistically
> > avaricious history.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Walter
> > <only taking cues from what I see in nature>
> >
> >
> > [rhinoceros]
> > What is worse is that we, unlike the rest of nature, know we won't
> > survive anyway. Not even the avidest survivalists, such as
> > non-smokers.
> >
> And when I'm dead
> And when I'm gone
> There'll be one child
> Born in this world
> To carry on
> To carry on

Blood, Sweat & Tears

One of many great groups in the late 60's--early 70's.....

Thanks, Joe

>
> > ----
> > This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2002 board on
> > Church of Virus BBS.
> > <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> > id=26266>

--
Walter Watts
Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc.
"No one gets to see the Wizard! Not nobody! Not no how!"


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:55 MDT