From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 17:46:53 MDT
On 7 Sep 2002 at 12:25, Archibald Scatflinger wrote:
>
> [joe]
>
> > Please show an example of this 'we' assertion. And as Nietszche
> > noted, humility in those of mediocre talents is merely honesty; in
> > those of great talent, it is hypocrisy.
>
> [from past message]
> [joe]
> No, first I process it, then I logically destroy it.
> [archibald]
> >
> > I am currently subscribed to Virus and Cybermind.
> >
> [joe]
> Either Cybermind finds you as bizarre and distasteful as we do, or
> none of us would desire to subscribe to it. [Archibald]
>
> I am curious if you were referring to someone other then yourself when
> you said we. I am sure many people would enjoy you having their
> opinions for them so they don't have to. Since you're omniscient
> andsuch.
>
I do not believe it is much of a stretch to say that others also find your
conspiratorial quackery to be distasteful and bizarre. Others here have
commented as much. Even Hermit has called you on them.
Why don't we take a poll as to whether list members find your cross-
posted paranoias in the least believable?
>
> Omniscient (Om*nis"cient) (?), a.
> [Omni- + L. sciens, -entis, p. pr. of scire to know: cf. F.
> omniscient. See Science.]
>
> Having universal knowledge; knowing all things; infinitely knowing or
> wise; as, the omniscient God. -- Om*nis"cient*ly, adv. "For what can
> scape the eye Of God all-seeing, or deceive his heart Omniscient?"
> Milton.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:56 MDT