From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 07:29:39 MDT
On 15 Sep 2002 at 8:25, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2002 at 2:35, Hermit wrote:
>
> >
> > [Joe Dees] This is Mermaid's favorite (and so far as I am able to
> > discern, her only) tactic; to refuse to consider a position on its
> > merits and instead engage in logically fallacious ad hominem
> > character assassination by association upon its author. But a
> > position must stand, or fall, on its own merits and independent of
> > its author; this is logical Holy Writ.
> >
> > [Hermit] Poor demented Mr McPees loses it again. He cannot refute
> > the fact that his 75% assertion is not supported by a meta-analysis
> > of polls by Gallup.
> >
> Taken BEFORE Bush began making his case at the UN; after that, a
> Time/USA Today poll showed an uptick to 75% > > He cannot refute the
> fact that Gallup reflected that > as many Americans think that the
> administration has not done enough to > explain to the American public
> why the U.S. might take military action > to remove Saddam Hussein
> from power as think that they should go to > war. > Hermit cannot
> refute the fact that that poll to which he referred was not only taken
> BEFORE Bush;s UN speech, but also showed that 80% would approve of US
> pre-emptive regime change in Iraq if the case could be made (remember
> the aluminum tubing, to be used to purify fissile uranium, possessing
> no other use, and which Iraq is attempting to obtain?) that Iraq is
> pursuing nukes. > > He cannot refute the fact that a Gallup poll
> indicates that far > more Americans think that we need UN approval
> before going to war than > think we should go to war. So he lies,
> becomes wrought up, whines, > screams and rants. > Hermit is pissed
> because I showed that he used an August 6th pre-UN speech poll to
> falsley indicate what people though concerning the issue after the UN
> speech. > > [Hermit] Given the total deterioration of his intellect
> (and > judgment), we can hope that it will not be much longer before
> he is > reduced to sitting drooling as he watches daytime television
> along > with his mother, rather than attempting to destroy keyboards,
> > inconvenient facts and the list with his fists. > The inconvenient
> fact that Hermit continues to conveniently forget (the chronology of
> poll vs. UN speech)clearly
> deminstrates that what he cannot truthfully prove he will resort to
> lying about. Thus, his debate ethics are as flawed as his intellect
> and his position, And, you sorry sack of snail shit, while my mother
> is incontinent and canot walk or feed herself, she does not drool, nor
> does she - or I - watch soap operas. > > ---- > This message was
> posted by Hermit to the Virus 2002 board on Church of > Virus BBS. >
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> > id=26582>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:58 MDT