From: athe nonrex (athenonrex@godisdead.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:43:25 MDT
however joe, you still miss the point...you are arguing within the infuence of an economic premis, something i am not.
a quick analogy:
man1: i propose, then, that ducks float in the sea as well, since they also float in rivers, lakes and even bath tubs full of water...
man2: but the sea os more prone to stormy weather, therefore sucks wouldn't be inclined to live there.
whereas man1 is arguing about the bouyancy of ducks, relative to different bodies of water, you, <cough> i mean man2, is arguing about the weather as per relative to different bodies of water. do you understand what i'm saying now?
i'm not arguing about economy (btw, socialism is economy, communism is gov't...they were intended to work in tandem, but communism died out a bit, while aspects and ideals of socialism still live in various economies...), rather, i am arguing about jobs. you are still on the premise that without a job to preform, there will be no work. allow me to reiterate in a simple logical proof...
[>=conditional, *= conjunction, v=either/or, ~=negation, --- = biconditional]
Jobs {J} are a type of Work {W}, but W does not depend upon having a J,
expressed as:
(J > W) * ~(W>J)
one can W even if one does not have a J
expressed as:
~J * W
therefore, Work does not depend on having a Job,
or:
(J>W) * ~(W>J)
~J*W
_____________
~(W --- J)
tell me joe, please, if i'm at all off? the logic is strong here. it's a simple table, where, given two definitions, one proves a lack of equivalence between two definitions.
you are arguing economical premises, when the arguement clearly calls for something other than economical premises.
i'm not talking about money or gov't or Jobs really even. i'm talking about the lack thereof. not that people will have no work, work will always be there. for someone who is really a musician, the music will be there even if the money is not. for a doctor, he will operate when he has to because he cares about people. for an engineer, whatever he creates or constructs will be done out of careful craftmanship, because he's not rushing himself on a deadline. does this not sound better than the current state of affairs?
and this thread has nothing to do, really, with "the law and what it used to be". i have no clue where you got that idea from, except that i plugged this thread while posting on that one, which may be where the confusion came from.
"your move..."beatnik
---- This message was posted by athe nonrex to the Virus 2003 board on Church of Virus BBS. <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=28871> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:43:38 MDT