virus: Re:The Disciplinary Process of the Church of Virus

From: Hermit (virus@hermit.net)
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 19:01:52 MDT

  • Next message: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Re:The Disciplinary Process of the Church of Virus"

    [Rhinoceros] I don't see it that way, because that would mean I could write a page titled VirusOperation and put the "WikiAccepted" seal on the top, inherited from DisciplinaryProcess, inherited from Disownment.

    [Hermit] You could only do that if your proposed Operations page, was agreed to by the council in discussion (bear in mind that Wiki development is a consensual and cooperative nomicon-like process) and contained no powers or processes that did not already exist. Naturally, none of this would be possible if DavidLucifer were not delegating these powers anyway (As a slightly Luminous chap put it recently, you don't have root on Lucifer).

    [Hermit] Look carefully at the DisownmentPage as it was when voted and at the Sheriffs Rules on the BBS as accepted. Then look again at the Disciplinary process page. You will see that no powers not already provided by the Disownment process and Sheriffs Rules are asserted. The disciplinary process as documented could be implemented totally under the disownment rules, but are intended to provide a clarification and process guidelines and avoid the negative aurora of "Disownment".

    [Hermit]

    [Rhinoceros] Of course, you are a virian in good standing as well, so your explanation has its weight too.

    [Hermit] Why thank-you.

    Regards

    Hermit 

    ----
This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2003 board on Church of Virus BBS.
<http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=29437>
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 19:02:07 MDT