Re: virus: Re:"Brights" more destructive than good / WSJ attacks atheism

From: Walter Watts (wlwatts@cox.net)
Date: Mon Oct 13 2003 - 17:20:33 MDT

  • Next message: Walter Watts: "Re: virus: Re:"Brights" more destructive than good / WSJ attacks atheism"

    I NO more identify with the brights, a strictly Daniel Dennett memeplex, than I would identify with a possibly future
    club formed by Stuart Kauffman (maybe the "Tiny Attractors").

    They are both brilliant scientist and I will steal only what my "cult of one" needs from each.

    In the mean-time, I remain a staunch "David Luciferian", thank you very fucking much!!!

    Walter

    David Lucifer wrote:

    > [Keith] I don't self-identify as a "bright" but I can see their point in trying to
    > get away from derogatory labels the way other groups have done.
    >
    > [Lucifer] Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons that the brights here do not self-identify with the brights?
    >
    > ----
    > This message was posted by David Lucifer to the Virus 2003 board on Church of Virus BBS.
    > <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=29508>
    > ---
    > To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l> 

    --
Walter Watts
Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc.
"Reminding you to help control the human population. Have your sexual partner spayed or neutered."
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 13 2003 - 19:52:15 MDT