From: David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Date: Sat Nov 08 2003 - 10:27:31 MST
Correlation does not imply causality, but correlation is all we can possibly
detect.
Given sufficiently corroborated correlation, we infer causality.
Likewise, coherence does not imply truth, but coherence is all we can possibly
detect.
Given sufficiently corroborated coherence, we infer truth.
Does that make sense? Has anyone seen this analogy before?
David
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 08 2003 - 10:28:22 MST