RE: virus: The Rumsfeld wriggle.

From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 13:33:35 MDT

  • Next message: Erik Aronesty: "Re: virus: Re:An Ultimatum"

    [Blunderov] Even more visual horror is leaking out of the Abu Ghraib prison
    and evidence is beginning to accumulate that Rumsfeld's hands are not clean.

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=523724
    <excerpt>
    Compelling evidence is emerging that responsibility for the abuse goes right
    to the Pentagon, where an ultra-secret "black operation" was set up to run
    the interrogation process. This unit, under the direction of Stephen
    Cambone, under-secretary of defence for intelligence, reportedly used
    theories developed by an academic to guide the torture of the detainees.

    The book, The Arab Mind by the late cultural anthropologist Raphael Patai,
    includes a 25-page chapter on Arabs and sex, stating that the biggest
    weakness of Arabs is shame and humiliation. Patai's book was described by
    The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh as providing an intellectual and practical
    underpinning of the culture of torture at Abu Ghraib.
    </excerpt>
    <excerpt>
    Mr Rumsfeld is fighting for his political life. The New Yorker report
    suggests he approved the covert operation, to which he appointed Dr Cambone
    as leader in order to obtain fast, "actionable" intelligence in pursuit of
    Mr Bush's "war on terror". The pressure to obtain this information - and the
    increasingly important role of the army's military intelligence soldiers and
    civilian interrogators - grew as the Iraqi insurgency against US forces
    developed.
    </excerpt>

    All that aside, something else is puzzling me. The sheer volume of material
    emerging from Abu Ghraib. I have read accounts of 1800 images and videos
    besides. In 3 or 4 months? The only thing that I can think of to account for
    this is that perhaps these materials were used to intimidate other
    prisoners.

    (Either that or some sort of virulent photographic meme ran like wildfire
    through the guards which seems, well, unlikely.)

    I wondered whether perhaps I had underestimated the volume of material that
    digital technology makes possible but if I understand matters aright, all
    these images, or at least most of them, are of seperate incidents.

    And the cameras seem always to have been there to record them.

    Thoughts? Links? What am I missing here?

    Best Regards.

     

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 13:34:43 MDT