From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Sat May 29 2004 - 01:41:41 MDT
Joe Dees
Sent: 29 May 2004 03:18 AM
If it turns out that Chalabi was an Iranian stalking horse mole, enticing
the US into Iraq at Iranian behest so we would topple the hated-by-them
Saddam for them by supplying us with disinfo. about Iraqi WMD's, they might
have outsmarted not only US intelligence, but also themselves, as I perceive
the example of a free, democratic and prosperous Iraq on their western
border to be a much greater threat to the continuation of the Iranian
mullahcracy than Saddam ever was, as the internal opposition inspired by
such an example will eventually lead to their demise...if their plan was to
use Sadr to engineer a friendly Shi'ite mullahcracy on their western border,
it has failed miserably.
---- [Blunderov] If. It seems to me that it will take many years of foreign occupation to realize this outcome. And that doesn't seem to be the plan right now. The history of Iraq suggests to me that the moment foreign troops leave there will be a coup. Maybe several. Democracy in the Middle East means Islam. And the Shi'ites ARE the majority in the area so it seems that Iran has backed the form horse at least. (Interestingly, that man Douglas Feith seems once again not to be very far away from the epicenter of disaster. His talent for making serious mistakes is quite breathtaking. I shall watch his further career with interest.) 'If' it turns out that the Likud party has been complicit in aiding and abetting the Iranian deception of the USA, this too may turn out to have interesting ramifications. Especially in conjuction with the possibility that it may have come to the attention of the house of Saud that it's ally, the USA, does not necessarily consider the relationship to be completely indispensable. Best Regards --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 29 2004 - 01:42:34 MDT