From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2002 - 06:57:40 MST
Thanks for your response which certainly widened my eyes.
I am not sure that I properly understand what you said though. You wrote
"Although symbology is a priori to cognitive transactions, it is not
predicate to the meta analysis." - would this be similar to, for instance,
analysing a game of chess in terms of the rules that are applicable to chess
rather than the dynamics of the play?
I think I understand enough of your critique to realise that pop goes
another weasel.
Oh well.
Blunderov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:39 MDT