From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 01:19:10 MDT
On 13 Sep 2002 at 8:47, Blunderov wrote:
> joedees@bellsouth.net
> Sent: 12 September 2002 11:48 PM
> On 12 Sep 2002 at 11:35, Archibald Scatflinger wrote:
>
> > [joe]
> > > To oppose an action against those who had engineered the deaths of
> > > three thousand of mostly American civilian citizens in her largest
> > > city, and who had pledged to perpetrate more of the same, is
> > > itself anti- american.
>
> [Blunderov]
> This doesn't seem logical. How is opposing such an action in and of
> itself anti-American? The opposer might quite easily have what they
> consider to be Americas best interests at heart; they might be a
> patriot of note. Or not. The question is entirely moot.
>
To advise someone not to defend themselves against their attackers
clearly does not demonstrate that the advisor harbors their best
interests at heart.
>
> Warm regards
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:57 MDT