From: Jei (jei@cc.hut.fi)
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 15:46:51 MDT
Published on Tuesday, April 20, 2004
by CommonDreams.org
War and Peace
NOTE: Marianne Williamson (http://www.marianne.com) is an internationally acclaimed
author. She has published nine books, four of which have been #1 New York Times
bestsellers, including her most recent, EVERYDAY GRACE. Her titles include HEALING
THE SOUL OF AMERICA and A RETURN TO LOVE. She also edited IMAGINE: What American
Could Be in the 21st Century, a compilation of essays by some of America's most
visionary thinkers. Marianne is a part of a citizen lobbying campaign to create a
U.S. Dept. of Peace - http://www.DoPCampaign.org
by Marianne Williamson
I remember before the war started in Iraq, watching Dennis Kucinich debate the Bush
administration's Richard Perle on television. Kucinich said that if we went to war there
would be hand-to-hand combat in Baghdad, to which Perle patronizingly responded that
Kucinich clearly didn't know what he was talking about.
Today, there is hand-to-hand combat in Iraq.
Those who think comparisons to Viet Nam are facile, might want to think again. Those who
think we are demonstrating for the entire world to see the unbeatable power of the United
States, might want to think again. Those who think what we are doing in Iraq is somehow
defeating terrorism, might want to think again.
It is hard to bear the thought of the fear our soldiers must be feeling now. They are
surrounded by people they were told would see them as liberators, so many of whom now see
them as an occupying army. Perhaps if we had had a real plan for what to do after
strutting our macho-gone-mad display of "Shock and Awe," we would indeed have won the
hearts of the Iraqi people. But clearly, we had no real plan for doing so. We seem to be
very efficient at waging war, yet almost inept at waging peace.
As it is, we hear quotes such as this one from a forty-year-old college graduate in Iraq,
who himself was imprisoned for two years by Saddam Hussein yet now resents the American
occupation. When asked by New York Times reporters whether he wasn't grateful to the
United States for overthrowing Saddam, he responded angrily, "It was God who finished
Saddam, not the Americans. The Americans broke all their promises to us, and they have
brought their infidel beliefs to Iraq. We hate them, and they are worse than Saddam."
What the United States government doesn't seem to understand is that you can't just go
around destroying people you don't like, and expect all your problems to be over. Behind
every Viet Cong there was another one behind the next tree. Behind Saddam there now
appears Moktade al-Sadr, and once we've dealt with him, the consciousness he represents
will morph into another leader just as troublesome.
Until we recognize the importance of our relationship to the hearts and minds of the
people of the world, we will continue to inspire enmity despite whatever good intentions
we actually bring to the table. You cannot impose your will on other people -- even if
your will is for their higher good -- and not expect them to resent you.
A nation is a collection of individuals, and individuals are deeply influenced by their
feelings. Imposing your will on others is a basically disrespectful stance, and showing
disrespect --- particularly to an Arab male, whose culture so focuses on honor and respect
--- is psychologically and emotionally inept.
Terrorism is an emotion turned into a political force. Until we recognize that, and deal
with emotion and psychology as the political factors they actually represent, we will
continue to strut our military power without consciousness or concern with how it feels to
other people when we do so. This will lead to disaster. It already has.
Governments tend to approach life from a left-brain, rationalistic perspective - which is
fine, except that most people don't. In l997, I met an Egyptian diplomat in Agra, India,
where I was leading a spiritual pilgrimage. He told me the following, which I quoted in my
book "Healing the Soul of America".
"I do not mean this as a criticism of the United States," he said. "I know the Americans
are good men and women. But please try to make them understand; many people in my part of
the world feel they have been forced to try to keep up with you, in a race we do not
really care to run. Your technology is amazing, but America seems spiritually polluted to
many of us. Your ways are not our ways, and while we were tempted for a while to think
that your ways should be our ways, we do not think that anymore.
This is the problem, Ms. Williamson, and there will be terrible consequences in the world
if Americans do not come to understand this. Islamic terrorists have had such success - if
you would call their campaigns a success - because they have been able to persuade
millions of peasants that America is bad. It was not too difficult to do, Ms. Williamson.
All they have to do is describe the television programs you export to this part of the
world, and people are horrified.
Your government does not understand. They do not see how the people feel. We need the
American people to understand. Perhaps you will bring more Americans to our part of the
world. If they come to understand us, then they will respect us. We would feel that
respect, and then I don't think the terrorists would have such success. This is not a job
the CIA can do. It is only a job which people can do."
What a tragedy, that our government does not reflect the emotional sensitivity and
sophistication of the average American. Until it does, we are all in danger.
###
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 03 2004 - 15:47:35 MDT